Sabtu, 25 Februari 2012

DLSU Lady Spikers wins over ADMU Lady Eagles in UAAP Season 74 Volleyball Women Finals Game 2 (Philippines)

Rival universities, Ateneo de Manila University and De La Salle University, faced off in a volleyball match in the UAAP Season 74 Volleyball Women Finals Game 2. It definitely became a tending topics to both students and mere-fans of the 2 universities alike.  Also, 6 spot among the Twitter Trending Topics were occupied by the game: “Allysa Valdez”, “Go Ateneo”, “Game 2″, “Ara Galang”, “Michele Gumabao” and “Mika Reyes”.

Image Credit: Iamjammed
ADMU Lady Eagles won the 1st set of the game but the DLSU Lady spikers get back by winning the 2nd through 4th set, making them the winner for this game.

Here is the scores of the game:

(DLSU-ADMU)
Set 1: 23-25
Set 2: 25-21
Set 3: 26-24
Set 4: 25-18

Michele Gumabao of DLSU Lady Spikers was named the Player of the Game, with her 18 points (12 attacks, 5 blocks, 1 ace).

DLSU Lady Spikers are a win away from bagging the championship. The 2 teams are set to compete for Game 3 on  February 29, 2PM at The Arena.

source: IamJammed

Jumat, 24 Februari 2012

High gas prices: Are traders to blame?

(MoneyWatch)  Record-high gas prices have been blamed on unrest in the Middle East, a pickup in the economy and rising demand from China and India. President Barack Obama is confronting Americans' anxiety over rising gasoline prices by drawing attention to his energy policies and taking credit for increased oil and gas production, a greater mix of energy sources and decreased consumption.
The average price of a gallon of regular gas has gone up more than 20 cents in the last month.
Image Credit: CBS News


But it appears rising gas prices are mostly due to the work of Wall Street speculators and traders -- not any increase in demand, according to a new report from Yardeni Research.

Mr. Obama is heading to Florida on Thursday to promote an energy strategy that the administration says will reduce dependence on foreign oil in the long term. But the president's pitch will also have a subtext: That the federal government can do little to halt the current rise in gasoline prices.



Obama to address gas prices, pitch energy policy
Oil prices hit 150-year high
Q&A: What the Dow numbers really mean

That certainly appears to be the case, according to economist Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. Oil futures traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange have leaped above $106 a barrel. The current national average for a gallon of regular gas stands at $3.61, up from $3.19 a year ago, according to AAA's fuel gauge report. That's the highest price at the pump ever for this time of year.

But speculators in the gas futures markets are largely to blame, according to Yardeni, not demand. "Large speculators and small traders were net long a record 101,926 [gas futures] contracts on February 14," Yardeni writes in a note to clients.

Since each contract is for 42,000 gallons, or 1,000 barrels, of gas, and gasoline inventories in the U.S. stood at 232 million barrels, "speculators and traders, in effect, held a record 43.8 percent of U.S. inventories," Yardeni says.

The economist says speculators must be betting that the confrontation with Iran will worsen, pushing gas prices still higher. "They certainly can't be betting on strong U.S. demand for gasoline," says Yardeni. Over the past year, gas usage fell to its lowest since Nov. 28, 2003.

"Americans are driving less and driving in more fuel efficient vehicles," Yardeni writes. See the chart of gas supplies vs. vehicle miles driven, courtesy of Yardeni Research, below:
Image Credit: Yardeni Research
 source: www.cbsnews.com/
4TE5GPRSQARB

New Facebook Privacy in Demand: Users Don't Want You Prying

Mark Zuckerberg asserted two years ago that privacy had become obsolete. We've entered a new age, he declared, where people are willing to share more, with more people.

"People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people," Zuckerberg said in 2010. "That social norm is just something that has evolved over time."
sent

Not so fast. There's no denying we share on social networks, posting everything from what we eat to who we're engaged to, but privacy isn't extinct or close to it.
Image Credit: Getty Image
Two new studies suggest people on Facebook are pushing back against the share-all culture and stepping up the ways they protect their personal information from strangers. It looks like private is the new public.

Researchers at Polytechnic Institute of New York University tracked the privacy settings of 1.4 million Facebook profiles belonging to New Yorkers over a 15-month period between March 2010 and June 2011.

They found a "dramatic decrease in the amount of information Facebook users reveal about themselves to the general public" and the authors concluded that the users became "dramatically more private" during the period, according to their report.

Over the same period, users stepped up the frequency with which they hid personal details in their public profiles, which are visible to anyone on Facebook, a friend or otherwise. To measure this, the researchers tracked nine characteristics often included on public profiles -- "friend lists, age, high-school name and graduation year, network, relationship, gender, interested in, hometown and current city" -- and monitored whether members shared fewer details over time.

They did: People wanted less personal information shared publicly, and the share of users who hid all nine attributes from their profiles more than doubled from 12.3 percent to 33 percent between 2010 and 2011. The share of users who hid their friend lists more than tripled during the 15 months, increasing from 17.2 percent of users to 52.6 percent.

"This is a large shift, especially if we consider that Facebook changed its default settings to disclose more information during this period," the researchers noted in their report, titled "Facebook Users Have Become Much More Private: A Large-Scale Study."

The Pew Internet and American Life Project also found that social networking users are taking greater care to manage their reputations and control their privacy online.

The two-year period between 2009 and 2011 witnessed an increase in the number of people who said they had untagged photos of themselves (37 percent in 2011, up from 30 percent in 2009), deleted comments about themselves (44 percent, up from 36 percent), or unfriended individuals (63 percent, up from 56 percent).
Both studies found women were more proactive about protecting their personal information than men. Sixty-seven percent of women on social networks limit their profiles to their friends, while just 48 percent of men do the same, noted Pew.

The data used in the NYU-Poly study was collected before a few important changes to Facebook's site, including the launch of simplified, inline privacy controls in August 2011 and the launch last fall of "frictionless" apps that allow users to instantly and seamlessly broadcast any action they take on a third-party app.

NYU-Poly computer science professor Keith Ross, who co-authored the study, noted that he and his colleagues are doing additional research to see whether the move toward more closed-off public profiles will continue.

Ross also predicted that as public profiles become more restricted, users may have more difficulty meeting new people or reconnecting with acquaintances.

"As people become more private in their public profiles and people are more privacy conscious, it's going to be harder for people to discover each other," said Ross.

These statistics paint social networkers as an increasingly privacy-savvy group of individuals who are concerned about who sees what details about them online and are taking steps to protect themselves.

There's an important distinction to be made between oversharing and not caring. It's true that users bombard their friends with mundane details about their snacks, runs, burps and buys. But that's when they know their audience -- not when they're addressing the world at large. We're less inclined to broadcast our status updates to strangers or reveal intimate details to the unknown, and social media companies would be wise to take note of just how far social norms have -- and haven't -- evolved.

source: www.huffingtonpost.com
4TE5GPRSQARB

Nike Foamposite Galaxy shoe spurs frenzy at malls

Sneaker fanatics who lined up outside stores overnight got their first crack Friday at a new outer-space themed Nike basketball shoe, getting so unruly in some cities that police were called to restore order.

In Orlando, more than 100 deputies in riot gear quelled a crowd awaiting the release of the $220 Foamposite Galaxy. At a mall in Hyattsville, Md., one person was arrested for disorderly conduct. And in Greenwood, Ind., police said they canceled a Nike release after 400 to 600 people showed up Thursday night at a mall and were "panicking to get to the front of the line." The shoe's release coincides with this weekend's NBA All-Star Game in Orlando.

Image Credit: http://www.sfgate.com


The shoes, part of a space-themed collection, are a draw for so-called sneakerheads who collect signature sports footgear and then resell it online at a marked-up price, sometimes for hundreds more than retail.
Malls in Florida, New York and Maryland reported bringing in police to manage fans clamoring for the purple-and-blue shoes, which have starlike flecks of white. Some shoppers lucky enough to get their hands on a pair immediately posted them for sale on eBay at skyrocketing prices: $1,000 and up.

Authorities did have some warning the shoe could cause mayhem. Earlier this month, police were called to a mall outside Albany after pushing and shoving broke out during a promotional event for the shoe.

Orlando resident Gaby Llanos was in the crowd waiting to buy two pairs of the shoes when the rush started outside Florida Mall.

"It was complete havoc," said Llanos, 23.

Nike issued a statement Friday, saying, "As with the launch of all Nike products, consumer safety and security is of paramount importance. We encourage anyone wishing to purchase our product to do so in a respectful and safe manner."

The shoes - which are being sold at Nike stores and select Foot Lockers, House of Hoops and Foot Action stores - are part of the Nike's Foamposite line which originally debuted in 1998. Their outer-space theme is a nod to Florida, the host state for the All-Star game, and the longtime launching pad for the nation's space program.

Nike has relied for years on its limited edition sneakers to generate a lot of buzz with minimal advertising.
"They keep them very limited, they keep them very hot that way," said Sam Poser, an analyst who covers Nike and the shoe industry.

Jennifer Aniston gets own star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame

Jennifer Aniston, who is best remembered for playing Rachel Green on the television sitcom ‘Friends’ and for the 2003 film ‘Bruce Almighty’, was honored with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame on Wednesday, February 22, 2012.

Aside from Aniston, some of the celebrities who get stars in 2012 for their work in movies, television, radio, and music include Vin Diesel, Scarlett Johansson, Adam West, Richard Burton, Kate Winslet, David Foster, Jennifer Lopez and Boyz II Men.

Image Credit: http://i.i.com.com
Speaking to reporters after the ceremony, the 43-year-old actress/director/producer admitted that she was “extremely flattered, humbled, nervous and excited” to have received such a recognition.

“It feels very surreal to be honest. I was born here and it’s sort of something you went and saw as a kid and got excited about just walking and seeing the names. To imagine that you’re going to be there is really special. It’s fun,” she added.

According to its official website, the Hollywood Walk of Fame is an internationally-recognized Hollywood icon. It is a tribute to all of those who worked diligently to develop the concept and to maintain a world-class tourist attraction.

source: CBS News

'Act of Valor 2012' glorifies Navy SEALs. But can they act?

Act of Valor: War movies in wartime inevitably are controversial. "Act of Valor" – the movie about US Navy SEALs – is bringing mixed reviews from professional film critics and moviegoers.

War movies in wartime – certainly since Vietnam – inevitably are controversial. John Wayne in “The Green Berets” and (ten years later) “Coming Home” with Jane Fonda come to mind. Pentagon propaganda or peacenik polemic, they are bound to generate dispute.
Image Credit: dadsbigplan.com


Then there’s the question about such films’ artistic merit as entertainment, which is what Hollywood is all about.

That question for “Act of Valor” – the war movie about US Navy SEALs, which opened this weekend – is bringing decidedly mixed reviews from professional film critics and moviegoers.

On film review aggregator “Rotten Tomatoes,” 84 percent of some 9,500 audience reviewers give "Act of Valor" at least 3.5 stars (out of 5) – basically a thumbs-up. But only 26 percent of 76 “Approved Tomatometer Critics” – those who write for newspapers, magazines, and broadcast outlets – give “Act of Valor” a positive review. The figure is even lower for those 27 reviewers the website designates “Top Critics” – just 19 percent.

Think you're a film buff? Take our movie trivia quiz!

The problem for many reviewers is the casting – actual Navy SEALs playing themselves. They may be highly-focused and genuinely heroic – nailing Osama bin Laden and rescuing people captured by pirates – but these are not drama school grads, and apparently it shows.

“Employing Navy troops as stars is a clever idea for an action thriller,” writes Claudia Puig of USA Today. “But the soldiers' awkward line readings are glaring enough to distract from the potency of the story.” (As a former naval officer, I must note that referring to Navy sailors as “soldiers” may be a keel-hauling offense.)
Robert Koehler at Variety calls it “a mechanically efficient yet soulless dramatization of the US Navy SEALs in action.”

The Monitor’s Peter Rainer gives “Act of Valor” a so-so C+.

“The movie is essentially a series of reasonably good action sequences,” Rainer writes. “The bad guys, who specialize in funny beards, funny accents, and shaved heads, would feel right at home in an ‘Austin Powers’ movie.”

 But of the warriors-turned-actors, he writes, “the SEALs here have been encouraged by their directors … to be as blandly stalwart as any garden-variety Hollywood counterpart.”

“Top Critic” Chris Vognar of the Dallas Morning News gives “Act of Valor” a thumbs-up B. But he also notes that “the movie doesn't pretend to be anything but propaganda, a modern-day cousin to the morale-boosting documentaries made by John Huston and Frank Capra during World War II.”

Kenneth Turan, who reviews movies for the Los Angeles Times and NPR, agrees with those put off by the acting ability of real-life SEALs.

But he also concedes that “given how hot, hot, hot SEALs have become after their role in the death of Osama bin Laden, the opportunity to see the genuine article in action rather than the likes of Demi Moore (‘G.I. Jane’) or Bruce Willis (‘Tears of the Sun’) is to a certain extent irresistible.”

“It still has some of that promotional film feeling to it, plus a healthy dose of worshipful mythologizing,” Turan writes. “But, frankly, once you see the SEALs in action, you may feel that a certain amount of lionizing is in order.”

There are better movies featuring US Special Forces portrayed by Hollywood actors. “Blackhawk Down” and “Clear and Present Danger” come to mind.

Rotten Tomatoes sums up its review of “Act of Valor” this way: “It's undeniably reverent of the real-life heroes in its cast, but Act of Valor lets them down with a clichéd script, stilted acting, and a jingoistic attitude that ignores the complexities of war.”
Or as the disabled Vietnam vet played by Jon Voight in “Coming Home” tells a group of high school students, “I'm telling you it ain't like it's in the movies.”

Think you're a film buff? Take our movie trivia quiz!



 
 Video Credit:  Youtube
 

Blockbuster Hollywood Movie Review 2012 : 'Act of Valor' starts at No. 1

Relativity Media's Navy SEALs action pic Act of Valor--one of the most unusual movie projects in Hollywood's history--is off to a strong start at the domestic box office, where it could earn $9 million to $10 million on Friday alone.

Friday afternoon returns show Act of Valor doing especially well in the Southeast, Southwest and West, regions rife with military bases.

Image Credit: screenrant.com

Males are most interested in seeing the movie, a demo that Relativity has aggressively gone after. The company hasn't excluded women, however, and has held a total of 415 screenings across the country, particularly in locations where there is a strong military presence. Another factor in the film's favor is its ethnically diverse cast.

Relativity also partnered with two military charities and built its online campaign around thanking SEALs for their service. The movie was screened at the White House in January, prompting President Obama to proclaim: "These are my guys," referring to the SEALs, who have been in the national spotlight since the death of Osama bin Laden.

Act of Valor is one of four new movies opening this weekend.

Tyler Perry's romantic drama Good Deeds, from Lionsgate, could gross $6 milion on Friday for a opening in the $15 million to $16 million range.

The news isn't so bright for Amanda Seyfried thriller Gone, from Summit Entertainment, and R-rated Paul Rudd-Jennifer Aniston comedy Wanderlust, from Universal.

Wanderlust, costing north of $30 million, reteams Role Models director David Wain with Rudd, who is a writer and producer on the new comedy, about an overstressed Manhattan couple who find a new way of life at a pastoral shared community. Relativity Media is a partner on the movie, which may only open in the $7 million to $8 million range.

Summit is releasing Gone for Lakeshore Entertainment and Sidney Kimmel, and has a net risk of $2 million on the pic. The marketing campaign for the thriller has targeted young girls. Early returns show the film grossing in the $4 million to $6 million range.